From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Betsch v. Chernushka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted September 7, 1999

October 18, 1999

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to declare the rights of the parties in a certain parcel of real property, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.).


ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of an order and judgment (one paper) dated August 3, 1998, in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeals from the order and judgment and an order of the same court, dated February 24, 1999, made upon reargument which superseded the order and judgment (see, CPLR 5501[a][1]; Betsch v. Chernushka, 265 A.D.2d 440 [Appellate Division Docket Nos. 98-08548, 99-02503, decided herewith]).

S. MILLER, J.P., O'BRIEN, RITTER, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Betsch v. Chernushka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Betsch v. Chernushka

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD F. BETSCH, et al., respondents, v. JOSEPH CHERNUSHKA, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 853