From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bethea v. Dist. of Columbia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Feb 3, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-1676 (UNA) (D.D.C. Feb. 3, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-1676 (UNA)

02-03-2016

TERENCE K. BETHEA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 28, 2015, the Clerk of Court received plaintiffs' civil complaint and applications for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. By Order entered on October 19, 2015, the Court directed each plaintiff to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).

On December 17, 2015, the Clerk of Court received a second civil complaint and a single application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis from plaintiff Vernon Lewis. The Clerk opened a new civil action, No. 16-0033 (UNA), and by Order entered on January 15, 2016, the Court directed each plaintiff to submit his trust fund account statement.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs' Motion to Correct the Record And Or Errata Notice [5]. It appears that plaintiffs submitted two identical complaints on two different dates, such that the Clerk of Court has opened two civil actions. Plaintiffs "feel that they are being put into a position of having to pay two partial filing fees which will ultimately bring the total amount of the filing fee to $700.00 . . . by virtue of the fact that there are two case numbers assigned to one case, which two orders requesting $350.00[.]" Pls.' Mot. ¶ 10. Their point is well taken, and the Court will issue a separate Order to dismiss Civil Action No. 16-0033. However, contrary to plaintiffs' assertion that "the filing fee requirements were met with respect to the first case number 1:15-cv-01676," id. ¶ 11, to date, no plaintiff has submitted the requisite trust fund account statement. Because plaintiffs have not complied with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), their applications to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied and this civil action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An Order is issued separately.

/s/_________

United States District Judge DATE: February 3, 2016


Summaries of

Bethea v. Dist. of Columbia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Feb 3, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-1676 (UNA) (D.D.C. Feb. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Bethea v. Dist. of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:TERENCE K. BETHEA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Feb 3, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-1676 (UNA) (D.D.C. Feb. 3, 2016)