Opinion
Argued June 18, 1999
October 12, 1999
In an action to recover damages based on medical malpractice, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.).
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The infant plaintiff died as the result of causes which, according to hospital records, included his exposure to respiratory syncytial virus, pneumonia, ventricular septal defect, chronic lung disease-pulmonary fibrosis, and anemia. In support of their motion for summary judgment, the defendants submitted evidence in admissible form which tended to show that they did not commit any acts or omissions which caused or contributed to the infant plaintiff's death. The plaintiffs failed to raise any issue of fact either as to whether there was a departure from good medical practice at any point during the treatment of the infant plaintiff, or as to whether any such departure actually caused the infant plaintiff's death. The defendants were therefore entitled to summary judgment ( see, e.g., Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320; Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851; Damen v. North Shore University Hosp., 262 A.D.2d 598 [2d Dept., June 28, 1999]; Kruck v. St. John's Episcopal Hosp., 228 A.D.2d 565).
BRACKEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, GOLDSTEIN, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.