Betancourt v. Nunez

Full title: Angel BETANCOURT, Appellant, v. Zaida NUNEZ, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Dec 11, 2014

151 So. 3d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 3D14–770.

2014-12-11

Angel BETANCOURT, Appellant, v. Zaida NUNEZ, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, George A. Sarduy, Judge. Angel Betancourt, in proper person. Zaida Nunez, in proper person.

PER CURIAM.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, George A. Sarduy, Judge.
Angel Betancourt, in proper person. Zaida Nunez, in proper person.
Before SUAREZ, ROTHENBERG, and LAGOA, JJ.

Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the denial of the former husband's petition to modify his alimony obligation to his former wife. See Garvey v. Garvey, 138 So.3d 1115, 1118 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“The standard of review for an order on a [petition] to modify alimony is abuse of discretion.”); Lopez v. Lopez, 920 So.2d 1165, 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“A trial court's Order regarding modification of alimony may not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a showing of clear abuse of discretion.”).

Affirmed.