Opinion
6:23-cv-469-PGB-LHP
05-17-2023
RUDOLPH BETANCOURT, Plaintiff, v. NOBLE PROPERTIES, LTD. and ASCEND GROCERY, LLC, Defendants
ORDER
LESLIE HOFFMAN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:
MOTION: PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE INSPECTION PURSUANT TO DE#4 AND DE#20 (DOC. NO. 26)
FILED: May 16, 2023
THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice.
Although labeled as “unopposed,” the motion fails to comply with Local Rule 3.01(g). In addition, the motion fails to comply with Local Rule 3.01(a).
This is not the first motion filed by Plaintiff - who is represented by two attorneys of record - that has failed to comply with the Local Rules. See Doc. Nos. 16-17. Plaintiff is cautioned that future filings that fail to comply with all Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules, and Court Orders may be stricken or summarily denied without further notice and without leave to refile.
DONE and ORDERED.