From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Betancourt v. Manning

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 18, 1996
679 So. 2d 83 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-2185.

September 18, 1996.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Louis Campbell, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Sandra S. Jaggard, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J. and GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.


The order finding the petitioner in civil contempt and committing him to jail for his failure to pay past due child support and attorney's fees is deficient on its face because it does not contain a finding that Betancourt has the present ability to pay the purge amount. See Johnson v. Felton, 655 So.2d 1286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Fennell v. Felton, 655 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Pino v. Felton, 647 So.2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Moreover, the record contains no evidence that he, in fact, has that ability. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985). As a result, in accordance with our prior order releasing the petitioner from custody on his own recognizance and the "confession of error" subsequently filed by the respondent, judgment in habeas corpus is hereby awarded.

Habeas corpus granted.


Summaries of

Betancourt v. Manning

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 18, 1996
679 So. 2d 83 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Betancourt v. Manning

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO BETANCOURT, PETITIONER, v. DONALD MANNING, DIRECTOR, DADE COUNTY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 18, 1996

Citations

679 So. 2d 83 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Rashid v. Manning

Because, as the respondent jailer apparently concedes, the record not only does not support, but is directly…

Raba v. Manning

The order finding the petitioner in civil contempt and committing him to jail for his failure to pay past due…