From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Betancourt v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 1, 2018
No. LA CV 16-07539-VBF-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2018)

Opinion

No. LA CV 16-07539-VBF-DFM

06-01-2018

LEROY BETANCOURT, Petitioner, v. ERIC ARNOLD (Warden), Respondent.


ORDER
Adopting the Report & Recommendation; Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition; Dismissing the Action With Prejudice; Terminating and Closing Action (JS-6)

The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on January 30, 2018, and petitioner has not objected within the time allotted by Local Rule 72-3.4. Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) recommend that when no timely objection is filed, the Court should review the R&R for clear error on the face of the record. On de novo or clear-error review, the Court finds no defect of law, fact, or logic in the R&R. Accordingly:

The Report and Recommendation [Doc # 14] is ADOPTED.

The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc # 1] is DENIED.

This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The case shall be TERMINATED (JS-6).

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 1, 2018

/s/_________

Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Betancourt v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 1, 2018
No. LA CV 16-07539-VBF-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Betancourt v. Arnold

Case Details

Full title:LEROY BETANCOURT, Petitioner, v. ERIC ARNOLD (Warden), Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 1, 2018

Citations

No. LA CV 16-07539-VBF-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2018)