From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bestop, Inc. v. MasterTop, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Sep 6, 2023
Civil Action 22-cv-02393-PAB-SBP (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-cv-02393-PAB-SBP

09-06-2023

BESTOP, INC., a Delaware limited liability corporation, Plaintiff, v. MASTERTOP, INC., a Colorado corporation, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

PHILIP A. BRIMMER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation to Administratively Close Case Pending Settlement Negotiations [Docket No. 44]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. Docket No. 44 at 4 n.1; see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on August 22, 2023. No party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is “no clear error on the face of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is

This standard of review is something less than a “clearly erroneous or contrary to law” standard of review, Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation to Administratively Close Case Pending Settlement Negotiations [Docket No. 44] is ACCEPTED;

2. This case is administratively closed, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, subject to being reopened for good cause shown;

3. The parties shall file dismissal papers within seven days of reaching a settlement, if such a settlement is reached; and

4. If settlement negotiations are not successful, the parties shall file either a joint status report or a motion to re-open the case by February 21, 2024.


Summaries of

Bestop, Inc. v. MasterTop, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Sep 6, 2023
Civil Action 22-cv-02393-PAB-SBP (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Bestop, Inc. v. MasterTop, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BESTOP, INC., a Delaware limited liability corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, District of Colorado

Date published: Sep 6, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 22-cv-02393-PAB-SBP (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2023)