From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Best v. U.S. Foods Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 2, 2014
Civil No. JFM-14-922 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2014)

Opinion

Civil No. JFM-14-922

07-02-2014

R. MICHAEL BEST, ET AL v. US FOODS INC., ET AL.


MEMORANDUM

This is yet another action instituted by Keith Dougherty, on behalf of himself and other plaintiffs. As the Third Circuit has found, Dougherty is a "frequent and frequently vexatious litigator." This action is simply another iteration of his practice of filing vexatious litigation. The action will be dismissed.

First, the complaint fails to comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Although Dougherty is proceeding pro se, he is an experienced litigant who, by this time, should know how to state facts that support his claim and to do so in a reasonably succinct manner.

Second, plaintiffs' claims against Judge Hess and Judge Bratton are barred by the Eleventh Amendment and by the doctrine of judicial immunity. Thus, assuming that they have been properly served, plaintiffs have stated no viable claim against them.

Third, it appears that this court lacks personal jurisdiction over Curtis Property Management Corporation.

A separate order is being entered herewith dismissing this action.

__________

J. Frederick Motz

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Best v. U.S. Foods Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 2, 2014
Civil No. JFM-14-922 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Best v. U.S. Foods Inc.

Case Details

Full title:R. MICHAEL BEST, ET AL v. US FOODS INC., ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2014

Citations

Civil No. JFM-14-922 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2014)