From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Best v. United Auto Indemnity Exchange

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 13, 1928
264 P. 1119 (Or. 1928)

Opinion

Submitted on brief by appellants and argued by respondent March 7, 1928

Affirmed March 13, 1928

From Multnomah: ROBERT G. MORROW, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

For appellants there was a brief over the names of Mr. Barnett H. Goldstein and Mr. Thomas Mannix.

For respondent there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Wilbur, Beckett, Howell Oppenheimer, with an oral argument by Mr. Ronald L. Reilly.


After an examination of the record and the assignments of error upon this appeal, the court is of the opinion that there is no merit in any of the points urged by the defendants.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed. AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Best v. United Auto Indemnity Exchange

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 13, 1928
264 P. 1119 (Or. 1928)
Case details for

Best v. United Auto Indemnity Exchange

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES SUMNER BEST, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, v. UNITED AUTO INDEMNITY EXCHANGE…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Mar 13, 1928

Citations

264 P. 1119 (Or. 1928)
264 P. 1119