From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Best v. Sears Roebuck Co

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2000
278 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 30, 2000.

December 19, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated August 5, 1999, which denied their motion, in effect, for leave to reargue a prior motion which was determined by an order of the same court dated March 24, 1999.

Arthur Best and Debra Best, Freeport, N.Y., appellants pro se.

L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita Contini, LLP, Garden City, N Y (Matthew K. Flanagan of counsel), for nonparty-respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiffs' motion was not based upon new evidence which was unavailable at the time of the original motion. Thus, it was actually a motion for reargument (see,, Citibank v. Olson, 204 A.D.2d 381; Chiarella v. Quitoni, 178 A.D.2d 500). The appeal must therefore be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Schumer v. Levine, 208 A.D.2d 605, 606).


Summaries of

Best v. Sears Roebuck Co

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2000
278 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Best v. Sears Roebuck Co

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR BEST, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SEARS ROEBUCK CO., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 350

Citing Cases

Best v. Sears Roebuck Co

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the…