From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Best v. Queens County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 21, 2008
54 A.D.3d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-07083.

August 21, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondent Robert Kohm, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, from conducting a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C in the matter entitled People v Best pending in that court. Application by the petitioner to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Meistro, J.P., Lifson, Carni and McCarthy, JJ.


Ordered that the application to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further, Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352). Similarly, the extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16).

The petitioner here has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

Best v. Queens County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 21, 2008
54 A.D.3d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Best v. Queens County

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HILARY A. BEST, Petitioner, v. QUEENS COUNTY SUPREME…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 21, 2008

Citations

54 A.D.3d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6669
862 N.Y.S.2d 612

Citing Cases

Valley Corp. v. Bollatto

Ordered that judgment is affirmed, with costs. Under the circumstances, the petitioner was not entitled to a…

In re Edwin Fishel Tuccio

However, the Supreme Court properly declined to compel the Commission to allocate 50.42 Pine Barrens Credits…