From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bess v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
May 8, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-185-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. May. 8, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-185-JJB-SCR

05-08-2014

LYNN BESS III (#318225) v. N. BURL CAIN, ETAL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated April 17, 2014 (doc. no. 11). The plaintiff has filed an objection which merely restates his prior argument and has been duly addressed by the Magistrate Judge.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915{e)(2)(B)(i), and without leave to amend because there is no conceivable, non-frivolous federal claim the plaintiff could assert against the defendants consistent with the facts alleged in his complaint.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 8th day of May, 2014.

__________

JAMES J. BRADY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Bess v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
May 8, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-185-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. May. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Bess v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:LYNN BESS III (#318225) v. N. BURL CAIN, ETAL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: May 8, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-185-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. May. 8, 2014)