Opinion
2012-09-17
STATE of Connecticut v. Albert KALIL.
Daniel J. Krisch, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. *218Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Daniel J. Krisch, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. *218Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 136 Conn.App. 454, 46 A.3d 272, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's decision admitting the testimony of a Rhode Island police officer on grounds that the evidence was admissible for proof of intent and to ‘complete the story of the charged crime’ and that the prejudicial effect did not outweigh the probative value?”