stating that a "master-servant relationship does not turn upon the payment of wages"
Summary of this case from In re HansenDecember 4, 1961
[In each action] Motion by respondent[s] to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs; appeal dismissed. Ughetta, Acting P.J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
stating that a "master-servant relationship does not turn upon the payment of wages"
Summary of this case from In re HansenFull title:THOMAS A. BERTINO, Doing Business as CEDARCREST DAY CAMP, Respondent, v…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Dec 4, 1961
As one court has explained: “The word ‘employee’ does not necessarily connote the payment of compensation,…
In re Hansen(Tr. at 97). Although courts disagree, most appear to hold that someone who is not paid is not employed. See,…