From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bert Amusement Corp. v. Holmden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 24, 1934
243 App. Div. 81 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

December 24, 1934.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Jeremiah T. Mahoney of counsel [ N. Taylor Phillips with him on the brief; Phillips, Mahoney, Leibell Fielding, attorneys], for the appellants.

Melvin A. Albert of counsel [ Milton C. Weisman with him on the brief; Weisman, Quinn, Allan Spett, attorneys], for the respondents.

Present — FINCH, P.J., MERRELL, MARTIN, O'MALLEY and UNTERMYER, JJ.; FINCH, P.J., dissents and votes for modification.


No one disputes the defendants' right of peaceful picketing. Likewise, no one will contend that in the exercise of that right the defendants might engage in violence, disorder and intimidation. Upon the present record the court was entirely justified in finding that the appellants' right to picket was accompanied by such acts of lawlessness committed by persons engaged in picketing for them, that all picketing should be enjoined.

The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.


The right to picket peacefully is now well established.

There is nothing in this record which shows that the unions are responsible for the disorders arising outside of these theatres. If this disorder could be traced to them, then it is equally well established that where they are responsible for violence and disorder they forfeit the right to picket. Since this record does not establish that they are responsible for violence and disorder, the right to picket with at least two pickets should not be taken away from them.

The order appealed from should be modified by permitting peaceful picketing by at least two pickets and an immediate trial should be had of the action, and as so modified affirmed.

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Bert Amusement Corp. v. Holmden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 24, 1934
243 App. Div. 81 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Bert Amusement Corp. v. Holmden

Case Details

Full title:BERT AMUSEMENT CORPORATION and Others, Respondents, v. HARRY HOLMDEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1934

Citations

243 App. Div. 81 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
276 N.Y.S. 236

Citing Cases

Rosekay Amusement Corp. v. Holmden

PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated in Bert Amusement Corp. v. Holmden ( 243 App. Div. 81), decided herewith,…