From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berster Techs. LLC v. Christmas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2012
No. CIV 2:11-cv-1541-KJM-JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV 2:11-cv-1541-KJM-JFM

01-12-2012

BERSTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. COY CHRISTMAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On January 12, 2012, the court held a hearing on defendants' December 2, 2011 motion to retain confidentiality and December 6, 2011 motion for terminating sanctions. Rajiv Dharnidharka appeared for plaintiff. Yuridia Caire appeared for defendants. Upon review of the motions and the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' December 2, 2011 motion to retain confidentiality is denied. The undersigned finds that defendants have not met their burden of establishing that any of the documents, let alone all of the documents, warrant the "Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only" designation. Defendants' belated attempt during the hearing on their motion to offer for the first time alleged exemplars of a few of these documents was improper.

2. In light of the ruling above, defendants' December 6, 2011 motion for terminating sanctions is denied.

_______________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Berster Techs. LLC v. Christmas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2012
No. CIV 2:11-cv-1541-KJM-JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Berster Techs. LLC v. Christmas

Case Details

Full title:BERSTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. COY CHRISTMAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

No. CIV 2:11-cv-1541-KJM-JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)