From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 29, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-0563-X-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 29, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-0563-X-BH

09-29-2020

DUANE L. BERRY, #62250019, Petitioner, v. ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. The case will be dismissed by separate judgment for failure to follow court orders.

If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of September, 2020.

/s/_________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Berry v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 29, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-0563-X-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Berry v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:DUANE L. BERRY, #62250019, Petitioner, v. ERIC D. WILSON, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 29, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-0563-X-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 29, 2020)