From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 14, 2001
801 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-4049

Opinion filed December 14, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; William J. Nelson, Judge.


Christopher Berry appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to his Apprendi claim without comment. See Jones v. State, 791 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Although the trial court failed to address Berry's second claim, we affirm as to it because, as presented, it is not cognizable in a postconviction proceeding. See McDaniel v. State, 683 So.2d 597 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (holding that claim that special condition of probation was illegal was not cognizable pursuant to rule 3.800(a)); Hardman v. State, 584 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (holding that challenge to condition of probation could have been raised on direct appeal and therefore could not be raised pursuant to rule 3.850).

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

Affirmed.

FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Berry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 14, 2001
801 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Berry v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM BERRY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 14, 2001

Citations

801 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Whitman v. State

Affirmed. See Burrows v. State, 890 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Nedd v. State, 855 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA…

Sigafoos v. State

Affirmed. See Cook v. State, 816 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Berry v. State, 801 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA…