From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Dec 11, 2014
NO. 14-13-00844-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 11, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 14-13-00844-CR

12-11-2014

TYRONE BERRY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 180th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1019634

ORDER

On April 28, 2014, appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant was provided a copy of the record and has been granted three extensions of time to file a pro se response to counsel's Anders brief. On December 8, 2014, appellant filed a pro se motion seeking to suspend the application of the rule limiting briefs and responses to 50 pages, which is now found in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(2) (amendments eff. Jan. 1, 2014).

We GRANT the motion and ORDER that appellant may file a pro se response to counsel's Anders brief of not more than 65 pages in length. Appellant's pro se response shall be due January 12, 2015. No further extensions of time shall be granted.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Berry v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Dec 11, 2014
NO. 14-13-00844-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Berry v. State

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE BERRY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 11, 2014

Citations

NO. 14-13-00844-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 11, 2014)