From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 29, 1977
345 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-1493.

April 29, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, M. Daniel Futch, Jr., J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, and David R. Evans, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted of violation of Section 832.05(3), Florida Statutes (1975). The trial court instructed the jury in accordance with the Florida Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases, using the appropriate instruction for violation of Section 832.05(3). The only issue is whether the trial court committed fundamental error, in view of the defense of good faith, by failing to also charge the jury that intent to defraud is an indispensable element of the crime of obtaining property in return for a worthless check.

This court has previously held that failure to give this additional instruction is fundamental error, the gravity of which requires reversal. Prince v. State, 333 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). On the authority of our holding in Prince, we reverse appellant's conviction and remand this case for a new trial.

Because of the conflict which exists between our holding and the Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases we hereby certify to the Supreme Court as a matter of great public interest the following questions:

1. Is the Florida Standard Jury Instruction entitled "Worthless Check — Obtaining Property F.S. 832.05(3)", set forth on pages 203 and 204 of the Second Edition, defective because it fails to instruct the jury that intent to defraud is an indispensable element of the crime of obtaining property in return for a worthless check?

2. In a prosecution for violation of Section 832.05(3), Florida Statutes (1975), where the trial court has instructed the jury in accordance with the Florida Standard Jury Instruction entitled "Worthless Check — Obtaining Property F.S. 832.05(3)", as set forth on pages 203 and 204 of the Second Edition, is fundamental error committed when the trial court does not additionally instruct the jury that intent to defraud is an indispensable element of the crime of obtaining property in return for a worthless check?

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MAGER, C.J., and ALDERMAN and LETTS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Berry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 29, 1977
345 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Berry v. State

Case Details

Full title:MABEL BERRY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 29, 1977

Citations

345 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Adams v. State

Other district courts of appeal, giving that dictum effect, have read intent to defraud into the statutory…

State v. Berry

The decision of the district court passed upon these questions, giving us jurisdiction by certiorari.Berry v.…