From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Porterfield

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 25, 2009
312 F. App'x 578 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-7857.

Submitted: February 19, 2009.

Decided: February 25, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00311-GCM).

Willie Lee Berry, Appellant Pro. Se.

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Willie Lee Berry appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Berry v. Porterfield, No. 3:08-cv-00311-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Berry v. Porterfield

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 25, 2009
312 F. App'x 578 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Berry v. Porterfield

Case Details

Full title:Willie Lee BERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Timothy PORTERFIELD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 25, 2009

Citations

312 F. App'x 578 (4th Cir. 2009)