From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Castro Farms

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 23, 1975
313 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1975)

Summary

In Castro v. Berry, 79 Cal. 443 [21 P. 946], the Supreme Court had before it the question of when an action would lie to determine an adverse claim, rather than by a proceeding in equity to remove a cloud.

Summary of this case from Miller v. Price

Opinion

No. 45129.

April 23, 1975.

Writ of Certiorari to the Industrial Relations Commission.

Howard B. Pearl, Citra, and Victor J. Musleh, Ocala, for petitioner.

Andrew G. Pattillo, Jr., Pattillo, MacKay McKeever, Ocala, for respondents.


Upon writ of certiorari heretofore issued, we have heard able oral arguments and have reconsidered the briefs and record herein and have concluded after careful study that there has been no departure from the essential requirements of law and accordingly the writ is hereby

Discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C.J., ROBERTS, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., and AGNER and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges, concur.


Summaries of

Berry v. Castro Farms

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 23, 1975
313 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1975)

In Castro v. Berry, 79 Cal. 443 [21 P. 946], the Supreme Court had before it the question of when an action would lie to determine an adverse claim, rather than by a proceeding in equity to remove a cloud.

Summary of this case from Miller v. Price
Case details for

Berry v. Castro Farms

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD BERRY, PETITIONER, v. CASTRO FARMS ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 23, 1975

Citations

313 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1975)

Citing Cases

Spotswood v. Spotswood

However, these considerations were not pressed in the court below, nor is it sought here to have a trust…

Miller v. Price

While the weight of authority is in support of the contention that equity will not interfere to remove a…