From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 8, 2010
Case Number: 1:09cv411 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 8, 2010)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:09cv411.

September 8, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on June 18, 2010 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8), defendants filed a response to the objections (Doc. 9) and plaintiff filed a reply to the response (Doc. 10).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

The Court does not find any prejudicial error and concludes that the evidence supports the ALJ's conclusion that Plaintiff is able to work and is not disabled.

Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This case is DISMISSED from the docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Berry v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 8, 2010
Case Number: 1:09cv411 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Berry v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Ruby J. Berry, Plaintiff(s), v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Sep 8, 2010

Citations

Case Number: 1:09cv411 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Justin P. v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

Nevertheless, substantial evidence must support the Commissioner's RFC finding. Berry v. Astrue, No.…

Bobbie N. E. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Nevertheless, substantial evidence must support the Commissioner's RFC finding. Berry v. Astrue, No.…