From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Air Force Cent. Welfare Fund

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 4, 2022
2:21-cv-01977-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01977-JCM-BNW

01-04-2022

CATHERINE A. BERRY, Plaintiff, v. AIR FORCE CENTRAL WELFARE FUND; AIR FORCE INSURANCE FUND, Defendants.

CHRISTOPHER CHIOU Acting United States Attorney HOLLY A. VANCE Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant HAND & SULLIVAN, LLC GEORGE F. HAND Attorney for Plaintiff


CHRISTOPHER CHIOU

Acting United States Attorney

HOLLY A. VANCE

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

HAND & SULLIVAN, LLC

GEORGE F. HAND

Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff CATHERINE A. BERRY, and Defendants AIR FORCE CENTRAL WELFARE FUND and AIR FORCE INSURANCE FUND, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants may have a 14-day extension of time, from January 3, 2022 to January 17, 2022, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint: Petition for Entry of Judgment in Accordance with Declaration of Default Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 918(a). (ECF No. 1).

January 17, 2022 is a federal holiday. See FRCP 6(a)(1)(C) (if the due date falls on a holiday, that due date is extended to the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or holiday).

An extension is warranted for several reasons. First, defense counsel's office recently lost a number of attorneys and staff. As a result, defense counsel is handling a higher-than-normal caseload. Additionally, only a limited number of attorneys and support staff may work in defense counsel's office at any given time due to the pandemic, thereby slowing the time it takes to process and complete required tasks. Defense counsel's calendar is also busier than normal with upcoming hearings and multiple filing deadlines in several cases, including two before the Ninth Circuit. Lastly, agency attorneys who are assisting with the case were out of the office for a brief period over the holidays. Under the circumstances, good cause exists to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint: Petition for Entry of Judgment in Accordance with Declaration of Default Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 918(a). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A) (“When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time… with or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires[.]”) (emphasis added).

This is Defendants' first request for an extension of time. See LR IA 6-1 (a) (must advise of previous extensions). Defense counsel contacted Plaintiffs counsel regarding this extension request, and he has advised that he does not oppose the request. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of undue delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Berry v. Air Force Cent. Welfare Fund

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 4, 2022
2:21-cv-01977-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Berry v. Air Force Cent. Welfare Fund

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE A. BERRY, Plaintiff, v. AIR FORCE CENTRAL WELFARE FUND; AIR…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 4, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-01977-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2022)