From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berring-Billman v. Doe

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Dec 13, 2022
Civil Action 5:21-CV-67 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 13, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 5:21-CV-67

12-13-2022

NICHOLAS THOMAS BERRING-BILLMAN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE #1, S.H.U. Lieutant (sic), JOHN DOES #2, Correctional Officer, JANE DOE, Day-Shift Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE #3, Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE #4, Compound/Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE #5, Compound/Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE #6, Compound/Correctional Officer, and MR. J. KONDRLA, a counselor at USP Hazelton, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOHN PRESTON BAILEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The above referenced case is before this Court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that this matter be dismissed with prejudice. See [Doc. 52].

This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written 1 objections to the magistrate judge's report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984), cert, denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation within the prescribed time frame.

Accordingly, a review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Therefore, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. 52[ is AFFIRMED, defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 46] is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff and to transmit copies to all counsel of record herein. 2


Summaries of

Berring-Billman v. Doe

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Dec 13, 2022
Civil Action 5:21-CV-67 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Berring-Billman v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS THOMAS BERRING-BILLMAN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE #1, S.H.U…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia

Date published: Dec 13, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 5:21-CV-67 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 13, 2022)