From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berreondo v. Akanno

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 27, 2015
623 F. App'x 485 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-15583

11-27-2015

MAXIMO BERREONDO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JONATHAN AKANNO, Prison Doctor, Kern Valley State Prison, Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00432-LJO-DLB MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Maximo Berreondo, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Berreondo failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant Akanno was deliberately indifferent to his pressure sores. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994) (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she "knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health"); Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1057-60 (neither a difference of opinion concerning the course of treatment nor negligence in diagnosing or treating a medical condition amounts to deliberate indifference); Jackson v. McIntosh, 90 F.3d 330, 332 (9th Cir. 1996) (a plaintiff "must show that the course of treatment the doctor[] chose was medically unacceptable under the circumstances").

We reject Berreondo's unsupported contention that the district court did not consider the evidence Berreondo submitted in his objections to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

Berreondo's request to be put on permanent "PLU" status, filed on September 17, 2014, is denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Berreondo v. Akanno

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 27, 2015
623 F. App'x 485 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Berreondo v. Akanno

Case Details

Full title:MAXIMO BERREONDO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JONATHAN AKANNO, Prison…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 27, 2015

Citations

623 F. App'x 485 (9th Cir. 2015)