From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beroukhim v. FDIC

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 26, 1999
168 F.3d 497 (9th Cir. 1999)

Summary

finding no duty to defend sexual harassment case that included claims of negligence and defamation under intentional act exclusion since non-harassment claims were "`inseparable'" from intentional harassment conduct

Summary of this case from Smith v. Animal Urgent Care

Opinion


168 F.3d 497 (9th Cir. 1999) David BEROUKHIM; Baroukh Beroukhim; BMB Properties, a California General Partnership; Yaghoub Beroukhim; Masoud Brokhim; Shanin Makhani, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FDIC, Statutory Successor to the Resolution Trust Corp., as Receiver for Mercury Fed. Savings and Loan Association; Carolyn J. Smith, aka Carolyn Marcial; Northwestern National Ins. Company, a Wisconsin corporation; David & Joseph Melamed, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56217. No.CV-92-07644-WMB United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit January 26, 1999

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Before FERGUSON, BEEZER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The court has reviewed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal of appeal and underlying district court action filed herein on January 11, 1999. The court approves the stipulation and in accordance with its terms, it is, now

ORDERED that the above-captioned appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice and each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. It is further,

ORDERED that the clerk of this court shall issue the mandate forthwith and send the same to the clerk of the district court together with a certified copy of this order and a certified copy of the stipulation filed by the parties on January 11, 1999.


Summaries of

Beroukhim v. FDIC

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 26, 1999
168 F.3d 497 (9th Cir. 1999)

finding no duty to defend sexual harassment case that included claims of negligence and defamation under intentional act exclusion since non-harassment claims were "`inseparable'" from intentional harassment conduct

Summary of this case from Smith v. Animal Urgent Care
Case details for

Beroukhim v. FDIC

Case Details

Full title:David BEROUKHIM; Baroukh Beroukhim; BMB Properties, a California General…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 26, 1999

Citations

168 F.3d 497 (9th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Animal Urgent Care

Other courts have similarly determined that inclusion of negligence-type allegations in complaints that are…

A.C.L.U. of Nevada v. City of Las Vegas

We dismissed cross-appeals from the district court's order in an unpublished disposition. ACLU v. City of Las…