From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bero v. Lazore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 12, 1995
211 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

January 12, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Franklin County (Ryan, Jr., J.).


In our view, Supreme Court did not err by denying defendant Ann Lazore's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against her in this personal injury action involving an automobile collision. A party seeking to vacate a default must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense. We agree with Supreme Court that Lazore has failed to demonstrate legal merit to her defense or a legitimate excuse for her delay in responding to the complaint she concedes that she received. Moreover, given the length of the delay involved, we find no reason to disturb Supreme Court's discretion in this regard.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Bero v. Lazore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 12, 1995
211 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Bero v. Lazore

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER BERO, Respondent, v. ANN LAZORE, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 12, 1995

Citations

211 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 946