Opinion
Monique Olivier, Esq., DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ OLIVIER LLP, San Francisco, CA, Alison Kosinski, Esq., Emily Thiagaraj, Esq., KOSINSKI + THIAGARAJ, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff, JULIA BERNSTEIN and Putative Class.
ROBERT JON HENDRICKS, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, San Francisco, CA, JENNIFER A. TOMLIN, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, VIRGIN AMERICA, INC.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
[X] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediationm
The Parties agree to select a mediator by August 26, 2015.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[] the presumptive deadline ( The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
[X] other requested deadline March 2016
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above:
[X] The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
[] The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________
IT IS SO ORDERED.