From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernstein v. Spatz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

June, 1936.


Order restraining defendant pendente lite from continuing in the employment of a concern named Murray's Inc. and from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the business of selling millinery and ladies' apparel in Far Rockaway, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bernstein v. Spatz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Bernstein v. Spatz

Case Details

Full title:LEE E. BERNSTEIN and SARAH WOLF, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)