From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernstein v. Romas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 20, 1989
149 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 20, 1989

Appeal from the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.).


Defendant purports to appeal from an order of County Court rendered August 4, 1987 which affirmed a City Court judgment in favor of plaintiff dated April 6, 1987. However, the notice of appeal is in fact from County Court's December 8, 1987 denial of a motion for reargument. No appeal lies from an order denying a motion to reargue. This appeal must therefore be dismissed. Moreover, even were we to consider the propriety of County Court's underlying order, we would affirm.

Appeal dismissed, with costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bernstein v. Romas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 20, 1989
149 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Bernstein v. Romas

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BERNSTEIN, Respondent, v. ANGELOS P. ROMAS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 20, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
540 N.Y.S.2d 34

Citing Cases

Matter of Mazurkiewicz v. Levine

In addition, the Board could rationally conclude that sufficient cooler space existed inside the building and…