From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernstein v. Holtz

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1901
34 Misc. 795 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Opinion

April, 1901.

Levy Myer, for appellant.

Aaron Morris, for respondent.


The issue was whether the defendant was the proprietor of the store at which his meeting with plaintiff's assignor took place, and whether he did in fact direct the latter to deliver goods, upon his credit, to that place at the order of his relative, Laski.

Upon this issue, the affirmative was supported by the testimony of Laski and of the plaintiff's assignor and there are no extraneous circumstances whatever, from which the court should necessarily infer that the defendant's denial was more probably true. There was no error in the exclusion of the defendant's check-books, offered in evidence to corroborate his testimony that he never paid his business expenses except by check, this testimony being opposed to the statement of the plaintiff's assignor that the defendant had made payments, on account of the goods, in cash. Certainly, the fact that the defendant drew checks in payment of his bills, to whatever number, could not bear upon the question whether, in a particular instance, he did or did not pay cash.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

LEVENTRITT and CLARKE, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Bernstein v. Holtz

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1901
34 Misc. 795 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
Case details for

Bernstein v. Holtz

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC BERNSTEIN, Respondent, v . WILLIAM HOLTZ, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Apr 1, 1901

Citations

34 Misc. 795 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Citing Cases

Gravel Prods. v. Sunnydale Acres

Such evidence, completely negative, has uniformly been held to be hearsay in character and incompetent and…