From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernstein v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 14, 1995
221 A.D.2d 214 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 14, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.).


Defendant's motion was properly denied. Here, defendant had actual knowledge of the defective bridge condition that caused the decedent's death by reason of the written report of the Department of Transportation's inspector that had noted the defect seven days earlier. Actual knowledge of a defect is an exception to the prior written notice requirement and where there is such notice, the 15 day grace period under the "pothole law" (Administrative Code of City of N Y § 7-201 [c] [2]) to repair a defective condition does not apply to insulate the defendant for failing to take some other appropriate measures within a reasonable time to prevent injury from the condition ( see, Klimek v Town of Ghent, 114 A.D.2d 614, 615).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Bernstein v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 14, 1995
221 A.D.2d 214 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Bernstein v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA BERNSTEIN, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 214 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 488

Citing Cases

Rojas v. The City of New York

Finally, the court notes that plaintiffs only cited a single First Department case, Bernstein v City of New…