From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernstein v. Anderson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 1, 2015
CV 15-00917 FMO (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2015)

Opinion

For Todd Bernstein, as trustee for the In Drew We Trust trust, Plaintiff: Jim D Bauch, Ryan D Lapidus, LEAD ATTORNEY, Daniel C Lapidus, Lapidus and Lapidus APLC, Beverly Hills, CA.

For Travis Anderson, an individual, Defendant: Lee David Lubin, LEAD ATTORNEY, Lee David Lubin Law Offices, Encino, CA.

For LIP SERVICE, LLC, Counter Claimant: Lee David Lubin, LEAD ATTORNEY, Lee David Lubin Law Offices, Encino, CA.

For Todd Bernstein, as trustee for the In Drew We Trust trust, Counter Defendant: Jim D Bauch, Ryan D Lapidus, LEAD ATTORNEY, Daniel C Lapidus, Lapidus and Lapidus APLC, Beverly Hills, CA.


OPINION

The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge.

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal Re: Lack of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 120 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Generally, a defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a). The court may dismiss the action prior to the 120 days, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before June 9, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b), the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response, if plaintiff/defendant files

■ Proof(s) of service of summons and complaint on the following defendant(s): MATT BLACK, LLC; IN DREW WE TRUST, TRUST; ESTATE OF DREW BERNSTEIN

■ An answer by the following defendant(s): MATT BLACK, LLC; IN DREW WE TRUST, TRUST; ESTATE OF DREW BERNSTEIN

■ Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a): MATT BLACK, LLC; IN DREW WE TRUST, TRUST; ESTATE OF DREW BERNSTEIN

on or before the date indicated above, the court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.


Summaries of

Bernstein v. Anderson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 1, 2015
CV 15-00917 FMO (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2015)
Case details for

Bernstein v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:Todd Bernstein v. Travis Anderson, et al

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 1, 2015

Citations

CV 15-00917 FMO (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2015)