Opinion
Argued June 11, 1909
Decided October 5, 1909
Andrew C. Morgan for appellant.
Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel ( Theodore Connoly and Clarence L. Barber of counsel), for respondent.
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts, upon the ground that the notice of intention to sue required by the act of 1886, and the demand required by the provisions of the city charter are concurrent in their obligations, both being conditions precedent to the right to maintain the action; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ. Taking no part: HAIGHT, J.