From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berning v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 22, 2022
655 S.W.3d 283 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84630

11-22-2022

Ryan Lee BERNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Justin Ortiz, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Justin Davis, Jefferson City, MO for respondent.


Justin Ortiz, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Justin Davis, Jefferson City, MO for respondent.

Before Division Four: Gary D. Witt, Chief Judge, Presiding, Mark D. Pfeiffer and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Ryan Berning appeals the Buchanan County Circuit Court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion for mental evaluation pursuant to section 552.020, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2021, because it failed to apply the proper standard to his motion. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reason for this decision is provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Berning v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 22, 2022
655 S.W.3d 283 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Berning v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ryan Lee BERNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 22, 2022

Citations

655 S.W.3d 283 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)