Jones v. Missouri-Edison Co. (C.C.A. 8) 144 F. 765; Price v. Union Land Co. (C.C.A. 8) 187 F. 886. A court of equity in a single suit will investigate and determine all questions incidental to the determination of the main controversy. Price v. Union Land Co. (C.C.A. 8) 187 F. 886; Ross v. Miller (C.C.A. 4) 252 F. 697; Bernier v. Griscom-Spencer Co. (C.C.N.Y.) 161 F. 438; Olmsted v. Superior (C.C. Wis.) 155 F. 172; Rogers v. Penobscot Min. Co. (C.C.A. 8) 154 F. 606; Jahn v. Champagne Lumber Co. (C.C. Wis.) 147 F. 631; Ingersoll v. Coram (C.C. Mass.) 127 F. 418; Mills v. Hurd (C.C. Conn.) 32 F. 127. It was essential to their right to maintain the suit in behalf of the Trust that the shareholders who had transferred their preferred shares should be restored to their former status as shareholders in the Trust, and such relief was incidental to the main relief sought.

" 36 Cyc. 554. Block v. Shaw, 78 Ark, 511, 95 S.W. 806; Collins v. Karatopsky, 36 Ark. 316; Senter v. Davis, 38 Cal. 450; McGarvey v. Hall, 23 Cal. 140; Grape Creek Coal Company v. Spellman, 39 Ill. App.? 630; Harle v. Brening, 131 N.Y. App. Div. 742, 116 N Y Supp. 51; Phillips v. Berger, 2 Barb. (N.Y.) 608; Bernier v. Griscom-Spencer Company, 161 Fed. 438; Sugar Beets Product Company v. Lyons Beet Sugar Refining Company, 161 Fed. 215; Kane v. Luckman, 131 Fed. 609; Fleishman v. Woods, 135 Cal. 256, 67 P. 276; Krouse v. Woodward, 110 Cal. 638, 42 P. 1084. The rules of equity, ancient as the courts of chancery themselves, require that he who comes into a court of equity must come with clean hands, and he who invokes equity must do equity.

K.C. So. Ry. Co., 326 Mo. 819, 33 S.W.2d 112; Caffery v. Choctaw Coal Mining Co., 95 Mo. App. 174, 68 S.W. 1049; Watson v. Woody Printing Co., 56 Mo. App. 145; Koelling v. Citizens Bank (Mo. App.), 237 S.W. 176; R.S. Mo. 1929, sec. 4549; Mobile Towing Wrecking Co. v. Hartwell, 206 Ala. 7, 89 So. 446; De Nunzio v. De Nunzio, 90 Conn. 342, 97 A. 323; Hague v. De Long, 282 Mich. 330, 276 N.W. 467; Stone v. State Tax Commission, 197 Wis. 71, 221 N.W. 376; Elkhorn Land Improvement Co. v. Childers, 30 Ky. L.R. 1121, 100 S.W. 222; Page v. Walser, 43 Nev. 422, 187 P. 59; Champollion v. Corbin, 71 N.H. 78, 51 A. 674; In re Jones Estate, 172 N.Y. 575, 65 N.E. 570; Banta v. Hubbell, 167 Mo. App. 38, 150 S.W. 1089; Addis v. Swofford (Mo.), 180 S.W. 548; Southington Bank Trust Co. v. American Baptist Home Mission Society, 96 Conn. 107, 113 A. 166; Lockhart v. Dickey, 161 La. 282, 108 So. 483; Lowndes v. Cooch, 87 Md. 478, 39 A. 1045; Condit v. Galveston City Co. (Tex. Civ. App.), 186 S.W. 395; Bernier v. Griscom-Spencer Co., 161 F. 438; 13 Am. Jur. 414; Vidal v. South American Securities Co., 276 F. 855; Norrie v. K.C. So. Ry. Co., 7 F.2d 158; Vanstone v. Goodwin, 42 Mo. App. 39; Hook v. Hoffman, 16 Ariz. 540, 147 P. 722; Talbot v. Talbot, 32 R.I. 72, 78 A. 535; Fletcher, Cyclopedia of Corporations, sec. 3429. (c) An appurtenance, capable of being conveyed by a deed describing merely the land, must partake of the nature of realty. 4 C.J. 1466; 8 R.C.L. 1068; 9 R.C.L. 737; Scheidt v. Belz, 4 Ill. App. 431.