From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernhan Chemical & Metal Corp. v. Ship-A-Hoy, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1922
234 N.Y. 563 (N.Y. 1922)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1922

Decided October 24, 1922

H.H. Nordlinger and Samuel H. Hofstadter for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

William W. Armstrong for defendant, respondent and appellant.


Order reversed in so far as it affirms Special Term order sustaining demurrer to counterclaim designated No. 7, and in so far as it reverses Special Term order and sustains demurrer to defense designated No. 3 in second amended answer, and otherwise affirmed, without costs to either party, and with leave to plaintiff to plead over within twenty days where demurrer is overruled. Questions all answered in the affirmative except the sixth, which is not answered; no opinion.

Concur: HOGAN, POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. HISCOCK, Ch. J., and McLAUGHLIN, J., concur except as to defense designated No. 3, as to which they dissent; CARDOZO, J., concurs except as to counterclaim designated No. 7, as to which he dissents.


Summaries of

Bernhan Chemical & Metal Corp. v. Ship-A-Hoy, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1922
234 N.Y. 563 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for

Bernhan Chemical & Metal Corp. v. Ship-A-Hoy, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:BERNHAN CHEMICAL AND METAL CORPORATION, Appellant and Respondent, v …

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1922

Citations

234 N.Y. 563 (N.Y. 1922)
138 N.E. 447

Citing Cases

Sommer v. Kelly Co.

"Every man is charged with knowledge of the law of his own State and of the Nation." ( Bernhan C. M. Corp. v.…

Bernhan Chemical & Metal Corp. v. Ship-A-Hoy, Ltd.

Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended so as to read as follows: "The order of…