From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernethy v. Sofradim Prod. SAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Oct 14, 2020
Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-19843 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 14, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-19843

10-14-2020

TAMIE BERNETHY, Plaintiff, v. SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS and TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On September 15, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause on or before September 30, 2020, why her case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants, Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories, Limited, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not shown cause. The court ORDERS that plaintiff's case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: October 14, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bernethy v. Sofradim Prod. SAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Oct 14, 2020
Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-19843 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Bernethy v. Sofradim Prod. SAS

Case Details

Full title:TAMIE BERNETHY, Plaintiff, v. SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS and TISSUE SCIENCE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Oct 14, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-19843 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 14, 2020)