From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernardini v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2010
CIV-S-09-1134 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)

Opinion

CIV-S-09-1134 FCD GGH PS.

February 2, 2010


ORDER


On November 16, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed November 16, 2009, are ADOPTED; and

2. Defendants Cate, Schwarzenegger, and Walker are dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Bernardini v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2010
CIV-S-09-1134 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Bernardini v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL BERNARDINI, Plaintiff, v. JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2010

Citations

CIV-S-09-1134 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)