Bernardez v. Firstsource Sols. U.S., LLC

2 Citing cases

  1. Young v. Chieftain Coating, LLC

    No. 20-CV-10520-DT (E.D. Mich. Jul. 29, 2022)

    The Court recognizes that other district courts within the Sixth Circuit have also granted pre-discovery motions for conditional certification based on plaintiffs declarations. See Hamm v. S. Ohio Med. Ctr., 275 F.Supp.3d 863, 875 (S.D. Ohio 2017) (granting a pre-discovery motion for conditional certification supported by two declarations); Bernardez v. Firstsource Sols. USA, LLC, No. 3:17-CV-613-RGJ, 2019 WL 4345986, at *2 (W.D. Ky. Sept. 12, 2019) (granting in part a pre-discovery motion for conditional certification supported by five declarations); Waggoner v. U.S. Bancorp, 110 F.Supp.3d 759, 764, 767, 773 (N.D. Ohio 2015) (granting a motion for condition certification without a request for formal discovery and based on five declarations submitted by plaintiffs).

  2. Hambrick v. Promevo, LLC

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-17-DLB-CJS (E.D. Ky. Jul. 2, 2020)   Cited 1 times

    At this conditional-certification stage "'disparate job titles and duties are largely irrelevant' . . . [instead] the relevant consideration is whether Plaintiffs were subject to Defendant's practice" of failing to pay for overtime work. See Bernardez v. Firstsource Sols. USA, LLC, No. 3:17-cv-613-RGJ, 2019 WL 4345986, at *6 (W.D. Ky. Sept. 12, 2019) (quoting Lindberg v. UHS of Lakeside, LLC, 761 F. Supp. 2d 752, 764 (W.D. Tenn. 2011)). "If discovery reveals that the class should be limited to a subset of the employees . . . the Court may address that issue on Defendants' motion at that time."