From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernard v. Schnier

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 17, 1983
438 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

Nos. 82-1265, 82-1886.

September 7, 1983. Rehearing Denied October 17, 1983.

Consolidated appeals from Circuit Court, Broward County; James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Bradford J. Beilly of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider Mager, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Mark Baer, Miami, and Thomas G. Sherman, Coral Gables, for appellee.


This suit involves a suit on a note. The determinative question is whether the note was under seal. The trial court determined that it was not under seal and that the suit was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. There is little authority on the subject, but we conclude that the trial court was incorrect. The note was a sealed instrument. The summary judgment is reversed. See Megdell v. Bailey, 194 So.2d 13 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and McCarley v. Board of Supervisors of Tippah County, 58 Miss. 483 (Miss. 1880).

The circuit court's assessment of attorney's fees against appellant under Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1979), is also reversed. The matter is remanded for trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bernard v. Schnier

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 17, 1983
438 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Bernard v. Schnier

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN BERNARD, APPELLANT, v. CHARLES SCHNIER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 17, 1983

Citations

438 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)