From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernard v. Henderson

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Oct 31, 2005
130 Wn. App. 1013 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

explaining how parties to "a partition action with respect to real property owned as tenants in common" could appropriately file a lis pendens, even though they would already be on the title; further noting that "[f]ailing to record a lis pendens to give buyers notice of a partition action would be imprudent"

Summary of this case from Ibbotson v. Riel (In re Riel)

Opinion

No. 55417-4-I.

October 31, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for San Juan County, No. 04-2-05051-1, Vickie I. Churchill, J., entered November 15, 2004.


Affirmed in part and reversed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Summaries of

Bernard v. Henderson

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Oct 31, 2005
130 Wn. App. 1013 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005)

explaining how parties to "a partition action with respect to real property owned as tenants in common" could appropriately file a lis pendens, even though they would already be on the title; further noting that "[f]ailing to record a lis pendens to give buyers notice of a partition action would be imprudent"

Summary of this case from Ibbotson v. Riel (In re Riel)
Case details for

Bernard v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:CONNIE ANN BERNARD ET AL., Appellants, v. BERT HENDERSON ET AL.…

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Oct 31, 2005

Citations

130 Wn. App. 1013 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005)
130 Wash. App. 1013

Citing Cases

Ibbotson v. Riel (In re Riel)

Additionally, case law located by the court includes examples in which already "on title" parties filed lis…