From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernard v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 17, 2005
Case No. SC05-1364 (Fla. Aug. 17, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. SC05-1364.

August 17, 2005.


Petitioner has submitted a letter which this Court has treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby transferred, pursuant to Harvard v. Singletary, 733 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 1999), to the Fifth District Court of Appeal. The transfer of this case should not be construed as an adjudication or comment on the merits of the petition, nor as a determination that the transferee court has jurisdiction or that the petition has been properly denominated as a petition for writ of mandamus. The transferee court should not interpret the transfer of this case as an indication that it must or should reach the merits of the petition. The transferee court shall treat the petition as if it had been originally filed there on the date it was filed in this Court and is instructed to expedite consideration of the petition as it appears to be time sensitive based upon the allegations. Any determination concerning whether a filing fee shall be applicable to this case shall be made by the transferee court. Any and all pending motions in this case are hereby deferred to the transferee court.


Summaries of

Bernard v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 17, 2005
Case No. SC05-1364 (Fla. Aug. 17, 2005)
Case details for

Bernard v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:SELWYN V. BERNARD, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., ETC.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Aug 17, 2005

Citations

Case No. SC05-1364 (Fla. Aug. 17, 2005)

Citing Cases

United States v. Mallery

It is their contention that the second lease agreement, covering the period from June 30, 1940, to June 30,…

M.H.B. Company v. Desmond

The cases there cited in the notes seem to amply support the text. We find nothing in Spencer v. Commercial…