From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernard v. City of Houston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Mar 22, 2017
CIVIL ACTION H-15-734 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION H-15-734

03-22-2017

GEORGE BERNARD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION

Pending before the court is the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") (Dkt. 36) relating to the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 34). The M&R advises that any parties wishing to object to the M&R must do so by March 16, 2016. Dkt. 36 at 64. The court has received no objections. The court, having reviewed the M&R, relevant documents within the record, and the applicable law, and having received no objections, ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. For the reasons stated in the M&R, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The plaintiff's claims, except for the excessive force claim against individual defendant Officer Ferdinand Rodriguez under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Signed at Houston, Texas on March 22, 2017.

/s/_________

Gray H. Miller

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bernard v. City of Houston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Mar 22, 2017
CIVIL ACTION H-15-734 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Bernard v. City of Houston

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE BERNARD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Mar 22, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION H-15-734 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2017)