From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernam, Tyson v. Hecht

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

January, 1928


Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The plaintiffs charge that defendant and Goelet Leasing Company have conspired to defeat the plaintiffs' claim. They are, therefore, entitled to a trial of the question as against both parties. ( Pease Elliman, Inc., v. Gladwin Realty Co., Inc., 216 App. Div. 421.) Rich, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., and Carswell, J., dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that between the Goelet Leasing Company and the other parties to the action there was no relationship which required that the Goelet Leasing Company be made a party.


Summaries of

Bernam, Tyson v. Hecht

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Bernam, Tyson v. Hecht

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES A. BERNAM and WILLIAM TYSON, Copartners, etc., and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1928

Citations

222 App. Div. 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)