From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berman v. Shalom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1991
171 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

March 4, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We disagree with the appellants' contention that the arbitrator's failure to make specific findings violated the terms of the parties' agreement to arbitrate. In any event, it is well established that an arbitrator's failure to set forth his findings or reasoning does not constitute a basis to vacate an award (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1]; Matter of Reddick Sons v Carthage Cent. School Dist. No. 1, 91 A.D.2d 1182; Tilbury Fabrics v Stillwater, Inc., 81 A.D.2d 532, affd 56 N.Y.2d 624; Matter of Colletti [Mesh], 23 A.D.2d 245, affd 17 N.Y.2d 460). Nor is there any basis for this court to vacate the arbitrator's award on the ground that it was excessive. As a matter of public policy the merits of an arbitration are beyond judicial review (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1]; Integrated Sales v Maxell Corp., 94 A.D.2d 221, 224). Kunzeman, J.P., Kooper, Harwood and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Berman v. Shalom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1991
171 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Berman v. Shalom

Case Details

Full title:DAISY BERMAN et al., Respondents, v. CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1991

Citations

171 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
566 N.Y.S.2d 950

Citing Cases

Whitney v. Perrotti

Plaintiff correctly concedes that the arbitrator did not "imperfectly execute[]" his power (CPLR 7511 [b] [1]…

Walzer v. Muriel Siebert Co., Inc.

"[I]t is well established that an arbitrator's failure to set forth his findings or reasoning does not…