From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berler v. Edelsohn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1926
216 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

May, 1926.


Order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, to dismiss the counterclaim, and for severance of the issues, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The motion to dismiss the counterclaim should have been made within ten days after service of the answer. (Rule 110, Rules of Civil Practice.) The issues presented by the pleadings as amplified by the affidavits show that the case should be tried, and not disposed of summarily. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Berler v. Edelsohn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1926
216 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Berler v. Edelsohn

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN BERLER, Appellant, v. DAVID H. EDELSOHN, Respondent. (Action No. 1.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1926

Citations

216 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Citing Cases

Aldus Realty Co., Inc., v. Breslof

Under Rules of Civil Practice, rule 110, which refers to a dismissal of a counterclaim where a prior action…