Opinion
January 28, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.).
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
By service of a summons and notice of motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, the plaintiff sought to recover on promissory notes executed by the defendants. Upon the plaintiff's prima facie showing of entitlement to recover, and upon the defendants' failure to interpose a defense cognizable at law, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment in the plaintiff's favor (CPLR 3213; see, Harris v Miller, 136 A.D.2d 603; Parry v Goodson, 89 A.D.2d 543; Diversified Indus. v Casa del Tesoro Corp., 79 A.D.2d 534; Logan v Williamson Co., 64 A.D.2d 466; see also, Marx v LaRouche, 152 A.D.2d 927). Mangano, P.J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.