From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berkowitz v. King David Kosher Restaurant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1991
169 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 28, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

By service of a summons and notice of motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, the plaintiff sought to recover on promissory notes executed by the defendants. Upon the plaintiff's prima facie showing of entitlement to recover, and upon the defendants' failure to interpose a defense cognizable at law, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment in the plaintiff's favor (CPLR 3213; see, Harris v Miller, 136 A.D.2d 603; Parry v Goodson, 89 A.D.2d 543; Diversified Indus. v Casa del Tesoro Corp., 79 A.D.2d 534; Logan v Williamson Co., 64 A.D.2d 466; see also, Marx v LaRouche, 152 A.D.2d 927). Mangano, P.J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Berkowitz v. King David Kosher Restaurant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1991
169 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Berkowitz v. King David Kosher Restaurant

Case Details

Full title:LILA BERKOWITZ, Respondent, v. KING DAVID KOSHER RESTAURANT, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)